Reification — De-Reification
Umpire #1 — I call's 'em as I sees 'em
Umpire #2 — I calls 'em as they are
Umpire #3 — They ain't nothin' until I calls 'em
I have been using metaphors such as paths and traps to summarize and characterize some phenomenological principles. For example, the trap metaphors are used as simplifications to help explain how specific mechanisms work by isolating them from other processes, and how particular causes produce their harmful effects.
We use metaphors, generalizations, and other ways of abstracting from raw sensory data to help us make sense of the complex and fine-grained objective reality with which we have to cope. It is important to understand that the models we use to represent objective reality is not the same as the reality (the map is not the same as the territory). The failure to appreciate the difference between the events that happen and the stories we tell ourselves to make sense of them, causes us to take our beliefs and perspectives too seriously [Reification].
Events and your reaction to events
The brain receives a lot of sensory input. To make sense of its environment, your nervous system summarizes and abstracts the raw data it receives to create understandings and stories. This interpretive process is vulnerable to the bias caused by your beliefs and perspectives. You can tell if you have develop a trap by being vigilant for repeating patterns of self-sabotaging reactions to the things that happen are often the catastrophic consequences of subtle errors of interpretation.
The Transformation of Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde
Dr. Jekyll is a college professor who sees me for anger management — although I have never seen him when he is not calm and rational. His descriptions of his viscous arguments with his wife are always delivered meekly and with great contrition. In my office Dr. Jekyll is experiencing these events from the dissociative perspective of the narrator; during the fight he is experiencing events from the associative perspective of a biological creature being provoked. For example, when describing a recent argument, Jekyll reports: "I felt hot and angry and thought, 'she is always putting me down; she is such a bitch.' But I know that I'm an ass-hole when I'm drunk. I'm probably more to blame than she is. . ."
The trance formation of Dr. Jekyll into Mr. Hyde began the moment he took his negative appraisals of his wife seriously, as if she really was a bitch who was always putting him down. By the time I saw him in my office he had returned to the subjective reality of the rational Dr. Jekyll. Note his statement, "I thought, 'she is always . . . '" Once he was able to view things from the observer's perspective he De-Reified the concept that she was and always would be a bitch, and, at least at a rational level, appreciated that the idea that she was a bitch was a creation of his nervous system, not hers.
Reification of pathogenic beliefs is the sinister potion
that turns the rational Dr. Jekyll into the destructive Mr. Hyde.
De-Reifying those abstractions is the antidote that can prevent
the trance formation.
My mission as Jekyll's therapist is to help him de-reify his pathogenic beliefs. The easy first step [described above] was to ask him to describe how the fight came about. To tell me, he had to describe the sequence of external events and internal states from the perspective of an observer. This dispassionate narrator in my office was not handicapped by state-dependent distortions, and had cognitive resources — including the ability to think rationally and the awareness of his motivation to be a good dad — that were not available to Mr. Hyde.
Jekyll was embarrassed by how he looked from this dispassionate perspective. A bit later in the session he vowed he would never get angry at her again, and would work to make amends for his previous destructive actions. Easy for Jekyll to say, but can he speak for Mr. Hyde? In the past, vows made by Dr. Jekyll have been routinely broken by Mr. Hyde.
Spouse abusers tend to follow a predictable sequence of escalating anger culminating in overt aggression, followed by a period of guilt, contrition, and the intention never to act out that way again. During the anger phase the previous intention not to act in the future has little influence, and during the contrite phase the abuser is certain that he will continue to perceive things from his current rational perspective, which, of course is an illusion.
Intellectual appreciation of the illusion of not sufficient if you cannot utilize the understanding to tame your emotional reactions to the things that happen. To promote good outcome in Jekyll's case we seek to de-reify abstractions such as, "She is always trying to undermine me, " and reify concepts such as, "Jekyll is a heroic guy who is more loyal to strengthening his family than to protecting his pride."
Reification in the service of will
Therapy often focuses on the De-Reification of pathogenic abstractions, but Reification is also a powerful therapeutic tool. I have purposely reified the concept of self-sabotaging traps to help you conceptualize how the cause-and-effect principles work. However, these traps are not assumed to exist as real entities. They are merely abstractions — stories — that help make sense of things, rather than valid and complete representations of the complex and finely-grained reality. [Likewise, the client examples presented throughout this course are used as fables that omit the complexity of the actual case, but still, hopefully, provide useful lessons for the reader].
The more you reify an abstraction — in the sense of taking it seriously and acting as if it were true — the greater the impact it will have on you. Since I think these concepts will be helpful to you, I want to reify them. On the other hand, you can help yourself by de-reifying pathogenic concepts such as "they are not going to like me" or "I've always been a loser."
The Meta-Cognitive Awareness that your appraisals, judgments, and interpretations are fictions that you create can free you from the Soul Illusion that results from taking it seriously. Indeed, you would create a different set of appraisals, judgments and interpretation, which may lead to a different emotional reaction, if you viewed the same event from a different perspective.
As long as they are not contrary to objective facts, none of the creative fictions are more valid than any of the others. Our collaborative task is to De-Reify the harmful fictions and Reify the helpful ones.
The Reification Fork
The events that happened in your life are what they are and can never be changed. However, the story you composed to summarize or interpret those events is one of an infinite number of equally valid interpretations. Some of these interpretations are pathogenic in that they promote outcomes that are not only bad for you, but self-confirmatory and so persist.
The mission of this course is to help you identify and De-Reify pathogenic abstractions, and to Reify the beliefs and perspectives that promote good outcome as you define it. With this in mind, a navigational fork is available here. One option is to follow a philosophical path that promotes de-reification of pathological concepts:
Or, you can use Suggestion as a tool to Reify abstractions that promote resourcefulness, confidence, and a healthy respect for the nature of your challenge.
Alternatively, you can follow the default path to access the contemporary thinking of Cognitive Therapy. Of particular interest are the pathogenic thinking errors to be vigilant for, and an excellent method to identify the specific cause-and-effect mechanism that is responsible for your self-sabotage trap.